Philly Legal News
  • Home
  • About the Editor
  • Feature
  • Blog
  • Trial & Deposition Technologies
  • Silent Advocacy Series
  • Contact
  • Legal News Digest — From the Courts & Legal Community
  • LEGAL EDUCATION & TRIAL TECH ARCHIVE
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About the Editor
  • Feature
  • Blog
  • Trial & Deposition Technologies
  • Silent Advocacy Series
  • Contact
  • Legal News Digest — From the Courts & Legal Community
  • LEGAL EDUCATION & TRIAL TECH ARCHIVE
No Result
View All Result
Philly Legal News
No Result
View All Result
Home Feature

How Can You Convert a Witness-Marked Foam Board into a Digital Trial Exhibit?

Thomas Oakes by Thomas Oakes
September 30, 2026
in Feature, Quick TechTips, Technology & Litigation Support, Trial Tips
0
Witness-Marked Foam Board into a Digital Trial Exhibit - Featured image for a PhillyLegalNews Quick TechTip showing an original witness-marked damages board beside a courtroom display. The display uses the same board information with digital highlighting and snapshot labels to illustrate how each presentation iteration can be saved and republished.

Digital snapshots preserve each annotated presentation version of the original foam-board exhibit.

0
SHARES
13
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A witness-marked foam board can be photographed and loaded into a trial-presentation system, where each annotated digital iteration can be preserved as a separately identified snapshot.

Part of the PhillyLegalNews Quick TechTips Series

Practical technology guidance for legal professionals from Thomas G. Oakes.

Quick Answer

Photograph the original witness-marked foam board and load that image into the trial-presentation system. The physical board remains the original exhibit; the photograph becomes the source image used for digital presentation.

Each time an arrow, text, highlight, callout, or other digital annotation is added, create and save a new snapshot. Identify the snapshots sequentially—for example, Exhibit 1-A, Exhibit 1-B, and Exhibit 1-C—and mark each one for identification so there is a preserved record of exactly what appeared on the screen.

Those saved snapshots can then be retrieved and republished during later testimony or closing argument without attempting to recreate the presentation.

Key Takeaways

  • Photograph the complete physical board and preserve the unaltered source image.
  • The foam board remains the original exhibit; the photograph becomes the source image for digital presentation.
  • Create and save a new snapshot each time a digital annotation changes.
  • Identify every snapshot separately so the precise screen version can be retrieved and republished.
  • Describe each digital change aloud so the transcript identifies what was displayed, subject to the judge’s procedures.

Bring the Witness-Marked Foam Board into the Presentation System

Begin with the witness-marked foam board that was used during testimony. The foam board is the original exhibit. If it has been marked as Exhibit 1, it remains Exhibit 1.

Photograph the original foam board and load that photograph into the trial-presentation system. The photograph provides the digital version of the original exhibit that can be enlarged and displayed on the courtroom screen. It does not replace or change the original foam-board exhibit.

Once the image is in the presentation system, counsel may add an arrow, text, a highlight, a callout, or another digital annotation to direct attention to a particular part of the exhibit.

Create and save a snapshot each time the digital presentation changes. A snapshot preserves exactly what appeared on the screen at that moment. This is important because digital annotations can be added, removed, or changed as the presentation develops.

Each time a snapshot is created or displayed, make a clear verbal record identifying the original exhibit, the digital annotation that was added, and the snapshot label. The saved snapshot preserves what appeared on the screen; the spoken description preserves in the transcript what changed and which version was shown.

For example:

  • Exhibit 1: The original foam-board exhibit
  • Exhibit 1-A: Digital snapshot with the first arrow or marking
  • Exhibit 1-B: Digital snapshot with an additional text label
  • Exhibit 1-C: Digital snapshot with a highlight or callout
  • Exhibit 1-D: Digital snapshot showing the completed presentation

Each digital iteration may or may not become a separately admitted exhibit. It should nevertheless be marked for identification so there is a preserved record of precisely what was displayed.

Saving each version separately also allows counsel to republish the exact digital presentation later. During another witness’s testimony or in closing argument, the trial team can retrieve Exhibit 1-A, 1-B, or 1-C without attempting to recreate the arrows, text, highlights, or callouts from memory.

The original foam board remains the exhibit. The separately identified snapshots preserve the different digital ways that exhibit was presented to the jury.

Related Articles

  • Should You Still Use Foam Boards in a Digital Trial Presentation?
  • When Should a Trial Exhibit Remain Visible on an Easel?
  • From News Anchors to Algorithms: How Civil Juries Changed with the Media Landscape
  • How Should You Prepare for Courtroom Technology Failure?

Learn More

  • Trial & Deposition Technologies
  • How Teaching Trial Technology Transformed a Generation of Trial Lawyers at Temple’s LL.M. in Trial Advocacy
  • Silent Advocacy Series
  • Blending Trial Technologies: Reaching Today’s Jurors Where They Are
  • TrialPad with Bob Christie: Featured Pros Live Review
  • Legal Education and Trial Technology Professional Archive

About the Author — Thomas G. Oakes

Thomas G. Oakes is a 45+ year legal professional in Philadelphia and the founder/editor of PhillyLegalNews.com and PhillyLegalConnect.com. He served for many years as an official court reporter in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and has worked as a freelance court reporter in state and federal courts for decades.

He holds the highest national court reporter certifications through rigorous testing, including credentials from the National Court Reporters Association and multiple state associations, including Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland. Tom was also the principal of Thomas G. Oakes Associates, a Philadelphia-based litigation support and trial technology firm serving attorneys nationwide for more than 33 years.

In addition to courtroom work, Tom is a nationally recognized leader in trial technology and a Certified TrialDirector Trainer. He has trained lawyers, judges, law clerks, paralegals, and trial teams in courtroom presentation and technology, and taught in Temple University’s LL.M. in Trial Advocacy program (with special recognition).

He has lectured at bar associations throughout Pennsylvania and nationally for organizations including the Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel (FDCC), the International Association of Defense Counsel (IADC), and the American Bar Association (ABA). He is also a co-founder of the FDCC Evolve program and an instructor in the FDCC Deposition Boot Camp.

Award: Temple University LL.M. in Trial Advocacy — 2013 Faculty Award for “Art of Technology in the Courtroom.”

Read the full editor bio →


Disclaimer

This article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney–client relationship. If you need legal advice about a specific situation, consult a qualified attorney in the appropriate jurisdiction.


About Philadelphia Legal News

Philadelphia Legal News is an educational publication dedicated to trial advocacy, legal technology, courtroom practice, and the history of the legal profession. Drawing on more than four decades of firsthand courtroom experience, Thomas G. Oakes shares practical insights, historical perspective, and commentary designed to benefit lawyers, judges, legal professionals, law students, and anyone interested in the evolution of the legal profession.

Learn more about Philadelphia Legal News and its editor →

Tags: courtroom exhibitsdemonstrative evidencedigital exhibit snapshotsdigital trial presentationfoam board exhibitstrial technologywitness-marked exhibits
Thomas Oakes

Thomas Oakes

Related Posts

Trial exhibit on an easel beside a digital screen during a courtroom presentation
Feature

When Should a Trial Exhibit Remain Visible on an Easel?

September 30, 2026
Handwritten damages calculation board displayed on a courtroom screen with the one-million-dollar total highlighted
Quick TechTips

Should You Still Use Foam Boards in a Digital Trial Presentation?

September 30, 2026
Chilton Davis Varner and George J. Lavin Jr. with IADC program imagery and the title “Why Silent Advocacy Still Matters.”
Feature

Chilton Varner and the George Lavin Memorial: Why Silent Advocacy Still Matters

September 25, 2026

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse By Category

  • About (3)
  • Court Rulings (1)
  • Criminal (1)
  • Depositions (8)
  • Feature (10)
  • Legal Analysis (15)
  • Legal Education (3)
  • Legal Education & Technology (4)
  • Legal History (7)
  • Legal Lecture Series (4)
  • Legal Lecture Series (2)
  • Legal News (1)
  • Litigation (2)
  • News Updates & Technology (8)
  • Quick TechTips (4)
  • Silent Advocacy Series (4)
  • Technology & Litigation Support (25)
  • Trial Advocacy (4)
  • Trial Practice (5)
  • Trial Tips (30)

Browse by Category

  • About
  • Court Rulings
  • Criminal
  • Depositions
  • Feature
  • Legal Analysis
  • Legal Education
  • Legal Education & Technology
  • Legal History
  • Legal Lecture Series
  • Legal Lecture Series
  • Legal News
  • Litigation
  • News Updates & Technology
  • Quick TechTips
  • Silent Advocacy Series
  • Technology & Litigation Support
  • Trial Advocacy
  • Trial Practice
  • Trial Tips
  • Home
  • About the Editor
  • Feature
  • Blog
  • Trial & Deposition Technologies
  • Silent Advocacy Series
  • Contact
  • Legal News Digest — From the Courts & Legal Community
  • LEGAL EDUCATION & TRIAL TECH ARCHIVE

© 2025 Philly Legal News

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About the Editor
  • Feature
  • Blog
  • Trial & Deposition Technologies
  • Silent Advocacy Series
  • Contact
  • Legal News Digest — From the Courts & Legal Community
  • LEGAL EDUCATION & TRIAL TECH ARCHIVE

© 2025 Philly Legal News