A key trial exhibit should remain visible as a continuing anchor for your client’s position while witnesses and digital presentations change.
Part of the PhillyLegalNews Quick TechTips Series
Practical technology guidance for legal professionals from Thomas G. Oakes.
Quick Answer
A key trial exhibit should remain visible on an easel when it reinforces your client’s position and provides the jury with a continuing visual anchor. A photograph, timeline, diagram or calculation board can remain in view while witnesses change and the courtroom screen presents other material.
Choose an exhibit that is legible from the jury box and position it so it does not obstruct the courtroom presentation. Once the court permits its display, plan to keep the key exhibit visible unless the judge directs that it be moved or covered.
Key Takeaways
- Select one key trial exhibit that clearly reinforces your client’s position.
- Keep the exhibit visible as a continuing visual anchor while witnesses and digital presentations change.
- Confirm that the complete exhibit is legible from the jury box.
- Position the easel so it does not obstruct the witness, judge, jury or digital screen.
- Once its display is permitted, keep the key exhibit visible unless the judge directs otherwise.
Keep the Trial Exhibit Visible as a Continuing Anchor
A physical exhibit offers something a changing digital screen cannot always provide: a fixed visual reference. The screen may move from a photograph to a document, a video or another witness’s exhibit. A carefully selected board can remain visible throughout those transitions.
In decades of courtroom and trial-presentation work, I have found that this technique is most effective when the exhibit expresses an important idea the jury will need repeatedly. A damages calculation, timeline, scene diagram or important photograph can anchor your client’s position while the testimony and digital presentation continue to develop.
The board must be readable from the jury box. Its placement also matters. The easel should not block the witness, counsel, judge, jury or digital screen.
Choose the exhibit carefully. One important trial exhibit can create continuity throughout the presentation. Several competing boards can divide attention and weaken the effect.
Plan for the Trial Exhibit to Remain in View
Continued display should be a deliberate trial tactic. Before trial, identify the exhibit that best reinforces your client’s position and plan for it to remain visible while witnesses change and other evidence appears on the digital screen.
A change in witness or subject does not automatically mean the physical exhibit should be removed. Its value comes from remaining available as a consistent visual anchor. Counsel can refer to it again when later testimony connects to the same calculation, event, location or central point.
Plan the placement before trial and determine who will position the board. Raise the intended continued display with the judge when appropriate and follow the court’s direction. If the court directs that the exhibit be moved or covered, comply with that instruction. Otherwise, the presentation plan should be to keep the selected key exhibit in the jury’s view.
The goal is not simply to leave a board standing. It is to choose an exhibit important enough to keep reinforcing your client’s position throughout the presentation.
Remember—you are the storyteller.
Related Articles
- Should You Still Use Foam Boards in a Digital Trial Presentation?
- How Can You Convert a Witness-Marked Foam Board into a Digital Trial Exhibit?
Learn More
- Trial & Deposition Technologies
- Silent Advocacy and Trial Law
- Blending Trial Technologies: Reaching Today’s Jurors Where They Are
- How Teaching Trial Technology Transformed a Generation of Trial Lawyers at Temple’s LL.M. in Trial Advocacy
- From News Anchors to to Algorithms
About the Author — Thomas G. Oakes
Thomas G. Oakes is a 45+ year legal professional in Philadelphia and the founder/editor of PhillyLegalNews.com and PhillyLegalConnect.com. He served for many years as an official court reporter in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and has worked as a freelance court reporter in state and federal courts for decades.
He holds the highest national court reporter certifications through rigorous testing, including credentials from the National Court Reporters Association and multiple state associations, including Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland. Tom was also the principal of Thomas G. Oakes Associates, a Philadelphia-based litigation support and trial technology firm serving attorneys nationwide for more than 33 years.
In addition to courtroom work, Tom is a nationally recognized leader in trial technology and a Certified TrialDirector Trainer. He has trained lawyers, judges, law clerks, paralegals, and trial teams in courtroom presentation and technology, and taught in Temple University’s LL.M. in Trial Advocacy program (with special recognition).
He has lectured at bar associations throughout Pennsylvania and nationally for organizations including the Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel (FDCC), the International Association of Defense Counsel (IADC), and the American Bar Association (ABA). He is also a co-founder of the FDCC Evolve program and an instructor in the FDCC Deposition Boot Camp.
Award: Temple University LL.M. in Trial Advocacy — 2013 Faculty Award for “Art of Technology in the Courtroom.”
Disclaimer
This article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney–client relationship. If you need legal advice about a specific situation, consult a qualified attorney in the appropriate jurisdiction.
About Philadelphia Legal News
Philadelphia Legal News is an educational publication dedicated to trial advocacy, legal technology, courtroom practice, and the history of the legal profession. Drawing on more than four decades of firsthand courtroom experience, Thomas G. Oakes shares practical insights, historical perspective, and commentary designed to benefit lawyers, judges, legal professionals, law students, and anyone interested in the evolution of the legal profession.



